1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 471 S.E.2d
  5. 471 S.E.2d 354 (1996)
 

STATE v. CHAPMAN

No. 221A95.

471 S.E.2d 354 (1996)

343 N.C. 495

STATE of North Carolina v. William K. CHAPMAN.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 13, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael F. Easley, Attorney General by Wm. Dennis Worley, Associate Attorney General, for the State.

John Bryson and Stanley Hammer, High Point, for defendant-appellant.

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant's only argument on appeal is that his confession should have been suppressed. He says this is so for several reasons. He first contends, relying on County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 111 S.Ct. 1661, 114 L.Ed.2d 49 (1991), and Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975), that there was an unreasonable delay in having a magistrate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases