1829 CATON REALTY v. CATON BMT ASSOCS.


225 A.D.2d 599 (1996)

639 N.Y.S.2d 110

1829 Caton Realty, Plaintiff, v. Caton BMT Associates et al., Defendants, J. Leonard Spodek, Appellant, and Allen Dorkin et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 11, 1996


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to this case since the stipulation that the appellant seeks to enforce is not a stipulation of final settlement to discontinue the action with prejudice (see, Dolitsky's Dry Cleaners v Y L Jericho Dry Cleaners, 203 A.D.2d 322; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases