Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the fact that he was in handcuffs during the showups, which were conducted in close spatial and temporal proximity to the crime, does not require suppression of the identification testimony relating to the showups (see, People v Carney,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.