Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant asserts that the trial court erroneously permitted the two complainants and another witness to give identification testimony. However, upon our review of the record of the suppression hearing and the lineup photograph, we conclude that the hearing court properly found that the lineup which the complainants had each separately viewed was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Chipp,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
