GLORIOSO v. DeBLASIO


227 A.D.2d 588 (1996)

643 N.Y.S.2d 402

Bartholomew Glorioso, Appellant, v. Peter E. DeBlasio et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 28, 1996


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although leave to amend pleadings should be freely given absent prejudice to the opposing party (see, CPLR 3025 [b]; Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 957; Thailer v LaRocca, 174 A.D.2d 731), such a motion should be denied where the proposed amendment is totally devoid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases