1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 466 S.E.2d
  5. 466 S.E.2d 340 (1996)
 

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR v. RUSH

No. COA95-40.

466 S.E.2d 340 (1996)

The NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Plaintiff, v. Gerald E. RUSH, Attorney, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fern E. Gunn, Deputy Counsel, North Carolina State Bar, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Cheshire & Parker by Alan M. Schneider, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

Gerald E. Rush, Salisbury, pro se.

McGEE, Judge.

The order of the hearing committee of the Disciplinary Hearing Commission of the State Bar dismissing the action against Rush does not contain findings of fact or conclusions of law. Rules and Regulations of the North Carolina State Bar (State Bar Rules) Subch. B, § .0109(5) states a hearing committee of the Disciplinary Hearing Commission has the power and duty to make findings of fact and conclusions of law when holding a hearing on a complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases