1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 466 S.E.2d
  5. 466 S.E.2d 334 (1996)
 

CRAVEN COUNTY BD. OF EDUC. v. WILLOUGHBY

No. COA95-155.

466 S.E.2d 334 (1996)

CRAVEN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Petitioner, v. Virginia WILLOUGHBY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henderson, Baxter & Alford, P.A. by David S. Henderson, New Bern, for petitioner-appellant.

Pamlico Sound Legal Services by Jack Hansel, Greenville, for respondent-appellee.

EAGLES, Judge.

Petitioner first argues that Danyun is not entitled to a free appropriate education because he is neither a domiciliary or a resident of Craven County, North Carolina. We disagree and affirm because we conclude that Danyun is a resident, although not a domiciliary, of Craven County.

Our Supreme Court has long recognized that the terms "residence" and "domicile" have different meanings.

"Precisely speaking, residence and domicile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases