1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 543 Pa.
  5. 543 Pa. 251 (1996)
 

COM. v. BIRDSEYE

543 Pa. 251 (1996)

670 A.2d 1124

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. William Robert BIRDSEYE and William Richard Birdseye, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 18, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Crawford, Jr., Pittsburgh, for William Robert and William Richard Birdseye.

Robert E. Colville, Kemal A. Mericli, and Thomas N. Farrell, Pittsburgh, for the Commonwealth.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE and MONTEMURO, JJ.

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The Appellants were found to have violated 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 911(b)(3) (Corrupt Organizations), 5902(b)(7) (Promoting Prostitution), 5903(a)(2) (Obscene Materials), 5703(1) (Interception of Wire Communications), and 5705(1) (Possession of Intercepting Devices). The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Appellants' communications were intercepted in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2516(2), such that the evidence gathered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases