U.S. v. RICHARDSON

No. 95-10107.

87 F.3d 706 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. L.D. RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 28, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Coggins, Dallas, TX, C. Richard Baker, Steven M. Sucsy, Tanya K. Pierce, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the United States Attorney, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Thomas Glasheen, Fadduol & Glasheen, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Appellant L.D. Richardson argues that the district court abused its discretion when it applied a consecutive sentence pursuant to § 5G1.3(c) by failing to consider certain factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) which guide a court in its determination of whether to impose a concurrent or consecutive sentence. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

BACKGROUND

On August 7, 1992, defendant L.D. Richardson was arrested for being...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases