Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for an award of costs and attorney's fees to enable her to prosecute her appeal from the order dated April 7, 1994 (see, Kret v Kret,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.