1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 187 Ariz.
  5. 187 Ariz. 605 (1996)
 

DOE v. ROE

No. 1 CA-CV 94-0057.

187 Ariz. 605 (1996)

931 P.2d 1115

Jane DOE, a single person, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ROE and Jane Roe, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

Review Granted February 26, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hofmann, Salcito & Stevens by Margaret F. Dean, Phoenix, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Renaud, Cook, Videan, Geiger & Drury, P.A. by William W. Drury, Jr., Steven G. Mesaros and Diane Mihalsky, Phoenix, for Defendant-Appellee John Roe.

Broening, Oberg & Woods by Jerry T. Collen and Neal B. Thomas, Phoenix, for Defendant-Appellee Jane Roe.

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

We must determine whether the trial court erred in entering summary judgment against Appellant, Jane Doe, on the ground that the statute of limitations barred her cause of action against her parents, Appellees John and Jane Roe, for her father's alleged sexual abuse of Doe when she was a minor.1 We view the facts favorably to Appellant and determine "de novo whether there are any genuine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases