NEESE v. MICHELIN TIRE CORP.

No. 2578.

324 S.C. 465 (1996)

478 S.E.2d 91

Samuel Terr an NEESE, Appellant, v. MICHELIN TIRE CORPORATION and South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation, Defendants, Of Whom Michelin Tire Corporation is Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided October 14, 1996.

Rehearing Denied February 21, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H.W. Pat Paschal, Jr., of Miller & Paschal, Greenville, for appellant.

N. Heyward Clarkson, III, of Clarkson & Fortson, Greenville, for respondent.


HOWELL, Chief Judge:

Samuel Terran Neese (Neese) appeals from the circuit court's order concluding that Neese's action against Michelin Tire Corporation (Michelin) was barred by the exclusivity provision of the South Carolina Workers' Compensation Act. We affirm.

I.

In 1991, Neese was employed as a truck driver by Vanguard Services, Inc. (Vanguard), an interstate trucking company. Prior to December 1991, Vanguard and Michelin entered into a contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases