1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 92 F.3d
  5. 92 F.3d 696 (1996)
 

VUE v. I.N.S.

No. 95-2152.

92 F.3d 696 (1996)

Kao VUE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, District Director, Carl R. Houseman, United States of America, Janet Reno, Attorney General, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided August 12, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Shulma, Minneapolis, MN, argued (Cathryn Middlebrook, on the brief), for petitioner.

Hugh Mullane, Washington DC, argued (Frank W. Hunger, William J. Howard, and Carl H. McIntyre, on the brief), for respondent.

Before McMILLIAN, LAY and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

Kao Vue (petitioner) seeks review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from a deportation order entered by an immigration judge (IJ) (hereinafter "IJ order"). In re Kao Vue, No. A23 864 378 (B.I.A. Apr. 13, 1995) (order dismissing appeal) (hereinafter "BIA order"). The IJ found petitioner deportable under both § 241(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases