1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 677 So.2d
  5. 677 So.2d 111 (1996)
 

WHITE v. MIAMI ELECTRONICS CENTER, INC.

No. 95-3564.

677 So.2d 111 (1996)

Oscar A. WHITE, Moises Saporta, Gladys Saporta, Jose Abut, Jeannette Abut, Salomon Worthalter and Minnie Worthalter, Appellants. v. MIAMI ELECTRONICS CENTER, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith, Mack, Lewis, Cohen & Lumpkin and Sarah B. Clasby and R. Hugh Lumpkin, Miami, for appellants.

Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin and Joel D. Eaton, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below dismissing the appellants' action for partition is affirmed because (a) there was no showing of a cotenancy on which to bottom such an action as required by section 64.031, Fla. Stat. (1995); see Weed v. Knox, 157 Fla. 896, 27 So.2d 419 (1946); Serkissian v. Newman, 85 Fla. 388, 96 So. 378 (1923); Barden v. Pappas, 532 So.2d 707 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), and (b) the effect of any partition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases