NAEGELE v. MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEV.

No. CX-96-201.

551 N.W.2d 235 (1996)

NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Appellant, v. MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 2, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard I. Diamond, Marvin A. Liszt, Diamond, Liszt & Grady, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Fred Burstein, Dylan J. McFarland, Burstein, Hertogs, Olsen & McFarland, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and PARKER and RANDALL, JJ.


OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Respondent Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA) issued a decision regarding appellant Naegele Outdoor Advertising's entitlement to relocation benefits for several advertising signs. Naegele appealed the MCDA's decision to district court and also sued for conversion. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the MCDA on the conversion claim and dismissed Naegele's direct appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases