1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 551 N.W.2d
  5. 551 N.W.2d 224 (1996)
 

AMERICAN COM. INS. v. MINN. MUT. FIRE

No. C9-95-499.

551 N.W.2d 224 (1996)

AMERICAN COMMERCE INSURANCE BROKERS, INC., Respondent, v. MINNESOTA MUTUAL FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 18, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon A. Hanson, Margaret K. Ackerman, Hanson Lulic & Krall, Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Linda S. Jensen, Messerli & Kramer, P.A., Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

At issue in this appeal is whether the phrase "series of related acts" in a business insurance policy is ambiguous and, if it is not ambiguous, how many "occurrences" arose under the policy. Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Company seeks review of a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision holding that the phrase "series of related acts" in an insurance policy with its insured, American Commerce, was ambiguous. Because that phrase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases