1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 672 So.2d
  5. 672 So.2d 100 (1996)
 

RUCKER v. GARLOCK, INC.

No. 95-190.

672 So.2d 100 (1996)

Bill RUCKER, et al., Appellants, v. GARLOCK, INC., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold R. Ginsberg and Todd R. Schwartz; Ratiner, Reyes & O'Shea, Miami, for appellants.

Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell and George N. Meros, Jr. and Mary W. Chaisson, Tallahassee, and M. Stephen Smith and Stuart L. Cohen, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

NESBITT, Judge.

Bill and Roberta Rucker sued Garlock, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of asbestos products, claiming Bill Rucker had incurred damages as a result of asbestos exposure. Based upon discovery violations, the trial court struck Garlock's pleadings and the cause proceeded to trial on damages only. At trial, Rucker presented expert evidence that he had an asbestos-related disease. Garlock introduced expert testimony that Rucker was well. Garlock argued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases