PER CURIAM:
We took this case en banc to consider the difficult problems attending application of United States v. Gaudin, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 2310, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995), which held that materiality is a question for the jury, not the court. With the benefit of additional briefing and oral argument before the en banc court, we are now persuaded that the district court did not withhold the element of materiality from the jury on the count on which defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.