Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Wade hearing should have been reopened because he subsequently learned that the pretrial identification procedures were unnecessarily suggestive. Specifically, he argues that the complainant, who had described one of the men who had robbed his store as having worn a red and black checkered shirt, had been shown a photograph of the defendant wearing a red and black checkered shirt, and that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
