VECTOR RESEARCH v. HOWARD & HOWARD ATTYS. P.C.

No. 94-3875.

76 F.3d 692 (1996)

VECTOR RESEARCH, INC.; Steven Fuhr; Barry Wade; and Paul Depinet, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS P.C.; William J. Clemens; Marshall & Melhorn; Richard G. Martin; Thomas Gutwald; Steven Goldner; and Joseph Smrcka, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided February 14, 1996.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied April 8, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack G. Fynes, Stephen A. Rothschild (argued and briefed), Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Toledo, OH, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James H. Geary (argued and briefed), Howard & Howard, Kalamazoo, MI, Thomas W. Palmer, Marshall & Melhorn, Toledo, OH, Jon H. Kingsepp, Howard & Howard, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for defendants-appellees.

Before: BROWN, NELSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied April 8, 1996.

BAILEY BROWN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE, J., joined. DAVID A. NELSON, J. (pp. 701-702), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a dispute between two rival manufacturers of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs), more commonly known as crash test dummies. First Technology...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases