MANTUA MFG. CO. v. COMMERCE EXC. BANK

No. 94-2139.

75 Ohio St.3d 1 (1996)

MANTUA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. COMMERCE EXCHANGE BANK, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 1, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Strachan, Green, Miller, Olender & Hobt, William R. Strachan and Kirk W. Roessler, for appellant.

Kelley, McCann & Livingstone, Thomas J. Lee and Peter M. Poulos, for appellee.

Harris, McClellan, Binau & Cox and John F. Casey; and Jeffrey D. Quayle, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Bankers' Association.


WRIGHT, J.

This appeal invites us to determine whether the trial court correctly refused to grant appellant Commerce's motion for a directed verdict and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The standards applied to motions for directed verdict and motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict are identical. Nickell v. Gonzalez (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 136,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases