1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 78 F.3d
  5. 78 F.3d 688 (1996)
 

FRIED v. HINSON

No. 94-1663.

78 F.3d 688 (1996)

Howard J. FRIED, Petitioner v. David R. HINSON, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 15, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Yodice, argued the cause for petitioner, with whom Ronald D. Golden, Frederick, MD, was on the briefs.

Kenneth G. Caplan, Special Attorney to the U.S. Attorney General, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before WILLIAMS, GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Howard Fried challenges the procedures used by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in deciding not to renew Fried's authority to examine pilots. Although Fried alleges a flurry of constitutional, statutory, and regulatory violations, none permit or persuade us to disturb the agency's result.

I. BACKGROUND

The Federal Aviation Act provides that the FAA administrator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases