STATE EX REL. YANT v. CONRAD

No. 95-1593.

74 Ohio St.3d 681 (1996)

THE STATE EX REL. YANT v. CONRAD, ADMR.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 1, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin D. Yant, pro se.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Yolanda V. Vorys and David J. Kovach, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

For the reasons that follow, we find that except for the identities of bureau employees who were reasonably promised confidentiality, the requested investigative files are public records which are not exempt from disclosure.

Yant asserts that he is entitled to a writ of mandamus under R.C. 149.43, Ohio's Public Records Act. Mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel compliance with R.C. 149.43. State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases