1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 74 F.3d
  5. 74 F.3d 676 (1996)
 

U.S. v. THOMAS

No. 95-1102.

74 F.3d 676 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Earl THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided January 16, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Hluchaniuk, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued and briefed), Bay City, MI, for plaintiff-appellee.

Thomas J. Plachta (argued and briefed), Brady & Plachta, Bay City, MI, for defendant-appellant.

Before: BATCHELDER and MOORE, Circuit Judges; ENSLEN, Chief District Judge.

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Malcolm Earl Thomas appeals his conviction for distribution of crack cocaine, arguing that the district court made three erroneous evidentiary rulings. First, Thomas argues that the district court erred by allowing his co-defendant, Darryl Nicholson, to testify about uncharged drug transactions. Second, Thomas claims that the district court should not have allowed a police officer to testify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases