SCHENCK v. HJI ASSOCIATES


295 N.J. Super. 445 (1996)

685 A.2d 481

STANLEY SCHENCK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HJI ASSOCIATES, HARRY BAILEY, AND JOSEPH BAILEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND IRA KUKAFKA, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 25, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Louis Grossman argued the cause for appellant.

James M. Siciliano argued the cause for respondents, Bailey.

Before Judges SHEBELL, BAIME and BRAITHWAITE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff, a real estate broker, is aggrieved by an adverse decision from an umpire appointed under the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-1 to 19. Following the umpire's decision, plaintiff moved in the Chancery Division to vacate the dismissal of his Complaint. However, following argument, the Chancery judge affirmed the umpire by order of November 9, 1995.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases