Plaintiffs' claim that they are entitled to judgment for breach of the non-solicitation provisions of paragraph 11 of the Television Services Agreement is without merit, as that provision was to be triggered only by an exercise of defendant's option to purchase all of MTI's equipment, which was not alleged. Concerning which party breached the Television Services Agreement first, we agree with the IAS Court that the conflicting affidavits submitted by the parties raise issues...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.