PER CURIAM.
Jose Perez, a railroad worker, appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion for directed verdict on his own comparative fault.
The jury was improperly charged to consider plaintiff's comparative fault on evidence that supported no more than assumption of the risk—a defense specifically barred under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA). 45 U.S.C. § 54 (1990); Taylor v. Burlington Northern R.R.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.