MATTER OF ADV. COMM. ON PROF. ETHICS NO. 22-95


144 N.J. 590 (1996)

677 A.2d 1100

IN THE MATTER OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS DOCKET NO. 22-95.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 13, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nola R. Bencze argued the cause for appellants New Jersey State Bar Association, Bar of the Special Civil Part and Commercial Collection Agency Section of the Commercial Law League of America (Jamieson, Moore, Peskin & Spicer, attorneys).

Alfred E. Ramey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (James J. Ciancia, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


PER CURIAM.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether a law firm that concentrates its practice in the field of collections law may, upon receiving checks payable to its clients, endorse the checks and deduct the firm's contingent fees where the client consents to that practice in the retainer agreement but does not thereafter expressly authorize the deductions with full knowledge of the total amounts collected.

In response to a formal inquiry, the Advisory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases