The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's claim that witnesses' identifications of him were unreliable was properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its verdict. Defendant failed to preserve his claim that there was legally insufficient evidence of first degree reckless endangerment and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice.
Defendant argues that the court failed meaningfully to respond to two jury notes....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.