Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that her conviction should be reversed because the trial court violated both CPL 270.30 and 310.10 by allowing the alternate and regular jurors to view her videotaped confession in the jury room outside the presence of the court, the defendant, and the prosecuting attorney. The defendant's challenge to this error, however, is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Agramonte...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
