1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 95 F.3d
  5. 95 F.3d 627 (1996)
 

EMMEL v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF CHICAGO

No. 95-3558.

95 F.3d 627 (1996)

Karen M. EMMEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF CHICAGO, also known as Hondo, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 12, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest T. Rossiello, Margaret A. Zuleger (argued), Rossiello & Associates, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellee.

Bradford L. Livingston (argued), Thomas J. Piskorski, Robert A. Kearney, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Danuta B. Panich, Marcia E. Goodman, Marian C. Haney, Eric Dreiband, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellant.

Before ESCHBACH, MANION, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

MANION, Circuit Judge.

In 1992 the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Chicago ("Coca-Cola") promoted five men into newly created upper-management positions. Because she was not one of those promoted, Karen Emmel filed a Title VII sexual discrimination complaint. Emmel was then passed over for another set of upper-management positions and filed a second complaint. These two complaints eventually reached a district court jury which ruled that Coca-Cola had violated Emmel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases