SAROSY v. SCHEINA


225 A.D.2d 493 (1996)

639 N.Y.S.2d 817

Victoria A. Sarosy et al., Appellants, v. David Scheina, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 28, 1996


A reasonable view of the evidence supports the jury's findings that, although defendant operated his vehicle negligently, the sole proximate cause of the accident was plaintiff's failure to drive with her car lights on as she approached the intersection; such findings are not inconsistent (see, Gross v Napoli, 216 A.D.2d 524). There is no merit to plaintiffs' claim that the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases