DUNHAM v. DUNHAM

(15261), (15262)

237 Conn. 480 (1996)

CARL DUNHAM, JR. v. ROGER DUNHAM ET AL. ROGER DUNHAM v. CARL DUNHAM, JR., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released June 25, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Ankerman, with whom, on the brief, was David C. Smith, for the appellant (Joan Dunham Rogerson).

Michael S. McKenna, for the appellee (Carl Dunham, Jr.).

Peters, C. J., and Callahan, Borden, Katz and Palmer, JS.


PER CURIAM.

The principal issues in this appeal arise out of claims that a will should not have been admitted to probate because one of the testator's sons, an attorney, allegedly exercised undue influence over the testator. The trial court, after a de novo trial, rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Carl Dunham, Jr., in which it held that the last will and testament of the testator, Jessica Scott Dunham, dated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases