CINCINNATI SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN. v. HAMILTON CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 95-1144.

74 Ohio St.3d 639 (1996)

CINCINNATI SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 1, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kohnen & Patton and David C. DiMuzio, for appellant.

Wayne E. Petkovic, for appellee Grandin House, Ltd.


Per Curiam.

The school board's contention is that the BTA erred in not carrying forward the 1989 valuation to the 1990 tax year. The school board further contends that the valuation established for the 1989 tax year must be carried forward until another value is established at the next sexennial reappraisal.

Grandin contends that, because 1990 was the first year of a triennial period, it was entitled to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases