PEOPLE v. HURTADO


234 A.D.2d 479 (1996)

651 N.Y.S.2d 561

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Armando Hurtado, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 16, 1996


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, among other things, that his wife's testimony was "self-contradictory", "extremely confused" and "tailored". The defendant also contends that the evidence may "readily be interpreted" as demonstrating that he accidentally cut his wife repeatedly with the knife and he was not aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death to the decedent at the time he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases