SMITH v. MARTIN

No. COA95-551.

478 S.E.2d 228 (1996)

C. Dupree SMITH and wife, Mae L. Smith, Plaintiffs, v. J. Matthew MARTIN, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, v. Robert HASSELL, Third-Party Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 3, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown & Bunch by Charles Gordon Brown and Scott D. Zimmerman, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellees.

Bryant, Patterson, Covington & Idol, P.A. by Lee A. Patterson, II, Durham, for defendant-appellant.


McGEE, Judge.

Defendant argues summary judgment for the Smiths was inappropriate because: 1) there were genuine issues of material fact as to what duty the defendant owed the Smiths; 2) the Smiths suffered no damages from any actions by the defendant because of an agreement to subordinate their loan to the UCB loan; and 3) there were genuine issues of material fact regarding the reasonableness of the damages awarded. Upon review of

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases