Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was entitled to an adverse inference charge because the People failed to provide to the defense a tape containing communications between police officers and a police department dispatcher. We disagree. According to the prosecutor, the tape had been destroyed by the police as a matter of due course. However, a copy of the log book entry regarding those communications was provided to the defense....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
