SCHUTZ v. FINKELSTEIN BRUCKMAN WOHL MOST & ROTHMAN


232 A.D.2d 470 (1996)

648 N.Y.S.2d 174

Robert N. Schutz, Respondent, v. Finkelstein Bruckman Wohl Most & Rothman et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 15, 1996


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleged that he was terminated from his employment on the basis of age and religious discrimination. In his original complaint, the plaintiff named only the defendant law firm. Several years later, however, he moved to amend the complaint to add the individual partners of the firm, and the partners opposed the motion, inter alia, on the ground that the Statute of Limitations barred the amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases