1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 685 So.2d
  5. 685 So.2d 15 (1996)
 

CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA v. WILSON

No. 95-0294.

685 So.2d 15 (1996)

CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Nancy WILSON and Kenneth E. Wilson, her husband, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing and Certification Denied January 24, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Regensdorf of Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, Miami, and Grossman & Roth, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

EN BANC

WARNER, Judge.

In this appeal, the appellant claims that reversal is required because appellees' counsel made an improper golden rule argument to the jury. Appellant argues correctly that our case of Miku v. Olmen, 193 So.2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. denied, 201 So.2d 232 (Fla.1967), adopts a principle that golden rule argument is per se prejudicial and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases