NOWATSKE v. OSTERLOH

No. 93-1555.

201 Wis.2d 497 (1996)

549 N.W.2d 256

Kim NOWATSKE and Julie Nowatske, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mark D. OSTERLOH, M.D., The Medical Protective Company and Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided April 3, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of David M. Skoglind, Esq. of Warshafsky, Rotter, Tarnoff, Gesler, Reinhardt & Bloch, S. C. of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Paul H. Grimstad and John F. Mayer of Nash, Spindler, Dean & Grimstad of Manitowoc.

On behalf of the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers, an amicus curiae brief was submitted by Mark L. Thomsen of Cannon & Dunphy, S.C. of Milwaukee.

Before Brown, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ.


NETTESHEIM, J.

Kim and Julie Nowatske appeal from a trial court judgment dismissing their complaint following a jury determination that Dr. Mark D. Osterloh was not negligent in his treatment of Kim for a retinal detachment condition.

On appeal, the Nowatskes challenge a trial court evidentiary ruling which allowed their medical expert witness to be impeached with evidence that the expert was named as a defendant in two prior unrelated medical malpractice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases