1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 287 N.J.
  5. 287 N.J. Super. 407 (1996)
 

HEALY v. FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIV.

287 N.J. Super. 407 (1996)

671 A.2d 182

JAMES B. HEALY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND FRANCIS J. MERTZ, NANCY S. BARRETT, MORDECHAI ROZANSKI, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy R. Hott argued the cause for appellant (Hott & Margolis, attorneys).

Maurice J. Nelligan, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Apruzzese, McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys).

Before Judges PRESSLER, KEEFE and WEFING.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, James B. Healy (Healy), appeals only from that part of a final judgment which determined, as a matter of law, that he did not acquire de facto tenure at defendant Fairleigh Dickinson University (University). Consequently, this appeal only involves the complaint brought by Healy against the University. We affirm.

In 1980, Healy became a full time faculty member of the University with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases