FIELAND v. FIELAND


229 A.D.2d 465 (1996)

645 N.Y.S.2d 530

Seymour Fieland, Respondent, v. Roslyn Fieland, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 15, 1996


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Although the Supreme Court was not obligated to consider the specific factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) in determining the husband's application for pendente lite relief, the court should have set forth the factors considered and the reasons underlying its decision to award the husband temporary maintenance (see, Calicchia v Calicchia,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases