Petitioner's request for review was not timely served upon respondents by November 29, 1993, the certified envelope in which the request had been mailed bearing a clearly legible United States postmark of November 30, 1993 (20 RCNY 1-17 [a] [1]; [c] [2]). Given the highly judicial nature of proceedings before respondent Tax Appeals Tribunal (see, NY City Charter § 168 et seq.), we view the filing that is required for an en banc review by the Tribunal of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
