PEOPLE v. DRESDNER


231 A.D.2d 455 (1996)

648 N.Y.S.2d 3

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel Dresdner, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 19, 1996


The court's denial of defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea was a proper exercise of discretion based upon its discounting of the complainant's recanted testimony of a rape and attempted burglary after conducting a hearing on the motion. In any event, the record reveals that the plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17), and it was not made otherwise by a postplea assertion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases