Defendant did not preserve by timely objection its present claim that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was erroneously structured (CPLR 4110-b). Question one on the verdict sheet was neither vague nor confusing. Both the oral agreement, as memorialized by the October 31, 1991 memorandum, and the formal contract that was never signed, referred to plaintiff's annual compensation in the amount of $200,000. Defendant's remaining contentions are...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
