As the IAS Court pointed out, the plain language of Labor Law § 240 (1), which simply refers to the "cleaning * * * of a building", reveals the lack of merit to the contention that routine maintenance cleaning not incidental to structural construction, repair or alteration, such as plaintiff was performing before falling off a ladder, is not a protected activity (cf., e.g., Terry v Young Men's Hebrew Assn.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BUENDIA v. NEW YORK NAT'L BANK
223 A.D.2d 456 (1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 70
Ricardo Buendia, Respondent, v. New York National Bank, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Scalon Cleaning Services, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 23, 1996
January 23, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
