1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 94 F.3d
  5. 94 F.3d 582 (1996)
 

U.S. v. GUTIERREZ-HERNANDEZ

Nos. 95-10188, 95-10195.

94 F.3d 582 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose GUTIERREZ-HERNANDEZ, and Raul Suarez-Reynoso, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Garland, Fresno, California, for defendant-appellant Jose Gutierrez-Hernandez.

Mark C. Ament, Assistant Federal Defender, Fresno, California, for defendant-appellant Raul Suarez-Reynoso.

William S. Wong, Assistant United States Attorney, Sacramento, California, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, EZRA, District Judge.

EZRA, District Judge:

Appellants contend that their respective sentences should be vacated because the district court failed to make the necessary factual findings at sentencing as to the amount of drugs implicated in a drug conspiracy. Raul Suarez-Reynoso ("Reynoso") further disputes his sentence on grounds that the district court failed to make specific factual findings as to (a) the amount of drugs involved in the conspiracy that were specifically attributable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases