FAWN LAKE APTS. v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 95-1151.

75 Ohio St.3d 601 (1996)

FAWN LAKE APARTMENTS, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION; OLMSTED FALLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 19, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Siegal Co., L.P.A., and Annrita S. Johnson, for appellant.

Kolick & Kondzer, Daniel J. Kolick and John P. Desimone, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Fawn Lake contends that the BTA should have deducted a reserve for replacements, employed a capitalization rate that reflected current returns on mortgages and equities, and agreed with its appraisal testimony. However, we disagree and affirm the BTA's decision.

In Freshwater v. Belmont Cty. Bd. of Revision (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 140, 568 N.E.2d 1215, we held that a reserve for replacements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases