SUMNER v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM


288 N.J. Super. 384 (1996)

672 A.2d 731

SHADAWN SUMMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND AND CLAUDIA S. PENA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND ANDRE M. SMITH A/K/A JOHN L. WHITAKER AND LUIS F. MEJIA, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 15, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Gorman argued the cause for appellant (Lutz, Shafranski, Gorman and Mahoney, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Gorman, on the brief).

Eric L. Harrison argued the cause for respondent Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys; Mr. Harrison, on the brief).

Philip G. Pagano, attorney for Claudia Pena, joins in the brief of appellant.

Before Judges KING, LANDAU and KLEINER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KLEINER, J.A.D.

Defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund was granted summary judgment on plaintiff Shadawn Sumner's complaint seeking damages for noneconomic loss sustained in an automobile collision on August 16, 1992. On that date, plaintiff was a passenger in an uninsured motor vehicle owned and operated by defendant Andre Smith. Smith's vehicle collided with a vehicle owned

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases