1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 543 N.W.2d
  5. 543 N.W.2d 123 (1996)
 

SAI v. LLOYDS

No. C3-95-1647.

543 N.W.2d 123 (1996)

SEMICONDUCTOR AUTOMATION, INC., Appellant, v. LLOYDS OF LONDON, a foreign corporation, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied March 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan D. Hollister, Rauenhorst & Knaak, Roseville, for Appellant.

Jon A. Hanson, Timothy L. Blakely, Hanson Lulic & Krall, South Minneapolis, for Respondents.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and KALITOWSKI and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Semiconductor Automation, Inc. (SAI) challenges the dismissal of Lloyds of London (Lloyds), a foreign corporation, for insufficient service of process. Lloyds seeks dismissal of this appeal, arguing that SAI's failure to appeal within 90 days of the district court's dismissal of Lloyds deprives this court of jurisdiction.

FACTS

Lloyds, acting at the request of its insurance broker Tower Special Facilities, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases